|
|
|
Security Services The El Dorado Advantage
Request More Information
ONGUARD Online Resources
EMail El Dorado Home
Rejected
Security Officer Went on Rampage
David Logsdon,
who was turned down for a private security license, killed his female neighbor
and stole her car. After the car was reported stolen, a patrol officer stopped
it. Logsdon escaped by shooting but not killing the police officer. Logsdon
then went to a Kansas City shopping mall where he shot and killed two shoppers.
When the police caught up with Logsdon, they shot and killed him.
Process
Serving
Service of process
is the procedure used to give legal notice to a person (e.g., a defendant) of
a court or administrative body's exercise of its jurisdiction over that person
so as to enable that person to respond to the proceeding before the court, body
or other tribunal. Usually, legal notice is furnished by delivering to the person
a set of court documents. Each
jurisdiction has rules regarding the means of service of process. Typically,
a summons and related documents must be served upon the defendant personally,
or in some cases upon another person of suitable age and discretion at the person's
abode or place of business or employment.
Service
of process initially establishes personal jurisdiction of the court over the
person served. If the defendant ignores further pleadings or fails to participate
in the proceedings, then the court or administrative body may find the defendant
in default and award relief to the claimant, petitioner or plaintiff. In
past times in many countries, people didn't have the right to know that there
were legal proceedings against them, and in some cases would only find out when
magistrates showed up with the sheriff and seized their property, sometimes
throwing them into debtor's prisons until their debts were paid. When the United
States was founded, the Constitution said that everyone is entitled to due process
of law, therefore the process server upholds a defendant's constitutional right
to due process of the law. (Source: Wikipedia Encyclopedia, www.google.com.)
Polygraph
Tests Not Admissible in Texas
A letter sent
to the Lufkin Daily News said, "A man in Lufkin was convicted of a crime
he did not commit, but was convicted with testimony of a sheriff deputy that
has been shown to make up testimony in other trials and cases before. If the
convicted man passed a lie detector test now that a jury has convicted him and
the appeals court has found no reason to give him a new trial, can the judge
overturn the conviction himself? This man is truly not guilty, and it is a shame
deputies can get away with lies on the witness stand. The lie detector should
have been done and presented as evidence. And that brings up another point.
If the man did have a lie detector test done, would it be considered new evidence
and could that get the man a new trial?" In a reply to the letter, Angelina
County Assistant District Attorney Art Bauereiss said, "Polygraph tests,
also known as lie detectors, are not admissible in criminal cases in Texas.
So no, the fact that a person passes (or fails) the polygraph examination does
not affect the result of the case. If an appeals court does not reverse the
conviction, the trial judge does not have the authority to overturn it later.
If there is proof that the deputy lied under oath at trial to obtain a conviction,
then the deputy could be prosecuted for aggravated perjury." (Source:
The Lufkin Daily News, www.lufkindailynews.com.)
Back
to Main Security News

800.221.3386
Fax 800.700.0126
specialist@eldoradoinsurance.com
Texas:
713.521.9251
Fax 713.521.0125
2515 North Blvd.
Houston, Texas 77098
California: 661.377.0260
Fax 661.377.0266
4100 Easton Drive,
Ste. 2
Bakersfield, CA
93309
Doing business
in California under License #OE59720, dba El Dorado Security Services Insurance
Agency.
Copyright
© 1998-2006 El Dorado Insurance Agency, Inc.
|